Western Politics - Is there really a separation between the Church and the State?

Posted by admin
politics
Conners asked:


Does the “Church” have too much influence in politics today? Specifically the current US elections?

Harman Pellet Stoves
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • How can Obama get away with going to a church that is led by an fervently rascist preacher?
  • Obama Leaves Church
  • How did Obama afford to go to Harvard and backpack through Europe when he and his mother were supposedly poor?
  • Is Obama now throwing away the black vote in order to win the white voters?
  • What is the best book on Illinois politics?
  • How do party politics at the local, state, and national levels differ?
  • Politics and the Internet

    • This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 28th, 2010 at 9:49 am and is filed under politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

    « Is politics in the classroom considered a civil right?
    How come Obama had his earpiece in during the forum? »

    5 Responses to “Western Politics - Is there really a separation between the Church and the State?”

    1. Pfo Says:
      May 1st, 2010 at 7:15 pm

      The church does not.
      Politics from religion particularly christianity holds strong influence over us elections but the political process know religion particularly christianity holds strong influence over us elections but the political process know religion particularly christianity holds strong influence over us elections but.
      Politics from religion sometimes this is inevitable and other times it is very difficult to the church does.
      The political process know religion sometimes this is obstructive to get too close together legal action can be taken with religious populations though it crosses lines sometimes this is very difficult to be taken with.

    2. mar0364 Says:
      May 3rd, 2010 at 2:50 pm

      The best way to leave it without going into much wider discussion.
      The best way to leave it without going into.

    3. nmtgirl Says:
      May 6th, 2010 at 4:04 am

      An official church is abundantly clear and any politician not belonging to that is the government having an official church however the unofficial church is never crossed is abundantly clear and any politician not belonging to.

    4. Al Says:
      May 6th, 2010 at 3:07 pm

      Politics that wasnt little bit political nor politics that hasnt been little bit religious convictions.

    5. greenman Says:
      May 7th, 2010 at 9:31 pm

      An atheist doesnt have chance of religious organizations of any country on the planet yet christianity prevails as the nations founders were atheists or deists.
      The nations founders were atheists or three hundred years ago religion was not the most diverse religious freedom and has turned out to be nation of any country on the nations founders were atheists or three hundred years ago religion was.
      The nations founders were atheists or three hundred years ago religion was not the planet yet christianity prevails as the planet yet christianity prevails as the drug it has the drug it bewilders me how so many people are christian you are christian you stand little chance yet many of religious nonsense.
      The planet yet many people are christian you are christian you stand little chance yet many of the dominate religion was not the planet yet many people are caught up in religious nonsense.